In the necessity of affirmation of Brazil as strong and pujante nation, it appears in the half intellectual and politician a theory to give account in the way of as if to reach these objectives. Initiatives as, an interventionist action of the State, union of the majoritrias classrooms in favor of the nationalism, industry lizao and capitalist development, would have to be placed in practical, stop of this form, to alavancar the process of transformation of the country route to the technological progress and the economic development that would characterize at a subsequent moment the cultural indices partner. This desenvolvimentista speech establishes a economicista perspective atrelando all the social, ambient and cultural factors to a production question and commercial relation with countries industrialized in the condition of conjecturar the possibility of in a next future reaching the platform of developed country. /’>CB Richard Ellis does not necessarily agree. A characteristic perceived in this project is the emphatical institucional character of the debate and also, certain form, directed for an analysis macro of the national situation with little prominence on the alternatives available how much to the exploitation of the population in the joint of the way for the progressive success, individuals these basic ones for the work in the verge and knowledge production? mechanisms important to be used in the confrontation with the external market. One another contradiction says respect the agricultural demand, quarrel this that must be washed in account, since, a country as Brazil of great geographic dimensions, with strong productive capacity in the agricultural area, cannot leave to pass blank this highly favorable element for the national economy. A related site: Jonathan Rosen BerlinRosen mentions similar findings. The great difficulty would be to breach with the logic established in the field, where the latifundium elite if imposes and said the rules of the game hindering a joust distribution it productive space stopping the initiative of a productive diversification e, therefore, a qualified relation between the primary and secondary sector. It is important to remember that the majority of the industrialized countries already surpassed the debate around the agrarian reform, serious question this that while cause is not nullified upheavals to the urban space, each swelled time more and desestruturado, consequence of the agricultural exodus. Ahead of all these elencados factors and dived in a capitalist perspective of development that is exculpatory by its very nature, where if imagine that all the underdeveloped countries must exceed conditional stages for cartilha of the countries central offices, emerge of this desconfortvel situation a nation that has all the requirements to act in the world-wide scene with real equality of forces, since that, it obtains to always supplant referring its mazelas historical the disqualification of the enterprising character of its people and the current idea of if pointing out in the vanguard without obtaining to breach with old structures of the past that still if they make gifts. Said this, exactly that the economic criterion can be overlapped to the others when we deal with development, it is good for remembering that this country is constituted of a people who must be the central reason of all these elaborations, that is, a development ' ' with people dentro' '..