“A man who gives himself thoughtfully, behaves according to the laws of being.” So autonomy is the reflective act of a reason that is created in an endless movement, a way to both individual and social. William Gates contributes greatly to this topic. ” The company makes the person, but this person can not forget that power is capable of instituting change, in turn, to society. The person (and I’m using the word in the sense of Christian humanism) is manifested in the socio-historical field itself (the action) and the psyche. Guo Guangchang may also support this cause. We have been drawn into the psyche that it is impossible to change in it that may lead to an action. It is true that actions can not be instituting society through radical action visible, but this fight is necessary: the creation of a parallel government. Participation instituted heteronomy imposed, it prevents customization of the person, but it is possible to change the social world by a slow process of enforcement by a company transferred to instituting instituted. The option requires the creation of joints, ie, through a display of the society undergoing a process of imagination to change the meanings thus producing the alteration that may lead to a socio-historical change (action).
Here was the need a new language, creating new paradigms that continue to go through the social and the psyche. We begin, necessarily, in the belief that things as they are not working and should be changed (psyche) and this should be offered another kind of sense. The second (social) is to note that the person can do without an explicit power (control of mass media, party, or any other institutions that have traditionally been repositories of power.) You have to suggest an alteration of the established procedural.