International Court

why reason the international community does not pledge in the direction to find a solution definitive, on the basis of the reaction of the civil society and in main the Rsolues of the ONU. Which the reply for the destination of the peoples withheld and imprisoned arbitrarily against groups that they intend to defend the human rights and they answer to the maken a mistake interests, accenting the racial discrimination as in Iraq and Afghanistan, Sudan or the Countries of Africa of the west. Therefore the question is to liberate the peoples of the detention fields? How to make possible a countersignature without the withheld ones are recenseados? in Sudan he had a census but is case of sara occidental person? Emfim must have an international legitimacy that ahead recognizes the right of the sovereign States of the obstacles created by others before the inapplicable Resolutions of the ONU? Far from any envolvement, Abdul G. Koroma, one of the 15 judges of the International Court of Justia (TIJ), pointed the way remembering the roll of the General meeting and the Advice of Security of the ONU. Credit: Dennis Lockhart-2011. The Community the International inceta to take the cabveis measures before ace decisions of the TIJ on the Sara (1975) and Palestine (2004), as well as on different artificias conflicts that threaten the peace and the stability in the world. The serraleons judge had defended the Sara as integrant part of a sovereign Country, even so Algeria, South Africa, Cuba continues supporting an unjust cause in favor of a resulted group of the cold war. Two conclusions had been restrained: Morocco are victim of an injustice. Because he historically has right on sara occidental person and Spain assume the responsible one for the descolonizao of the territory..