We attend to a series of news articles showing the drama of the families reached for floods and one of them repeated some times in the noble schedule of the TV was of a small community that saved its 56 lives grasped to the twigs of two feet of jaca. It was possible to observe apprehension and joy for having been safe, especially for two trees. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Erin Callan has to say. The interviewed ones had gratitude for the friends who before remembered its shade and its fruits, but now would be recognized for them to keep the life and not to have left them to be dragged done a falling leaf in the fury of the torrent, as well as had been its houses. It is at least lamentable to see great part of the quarrel in the parliament of the Forest Code for leaderships in the power that are not capable to look at the trees beyond the perspective of economic nuisance and that they confused agriculture and the development. These leaderships needed to talk more with its bases. The real agriculturist, in its great majority, knows to recognize the importance of the trees in its productive system and its paper conservative of landscape. Not its leaderships, nor the technician that forbid insumos and nor the ones that supply financing, which vendem the idea of that to produce until the maximum limit of the property is that jointly it would give to income and profits. What we attend are the supplying companies of insumos and the banks profiting from this mechanism of modernization of agriculture the decades, but very few agriculturists. History already showed some times that a economic system sample robustness and duration in the time not only for the capacity that has to grow and if to expand, but basically for the capacity to assimilate for determined time its revezes and its intemperies.