Obviously, the person organizing a general meeting of shareholders has increased opportunities for abuse (for example, in the counting of votes, the choice of notification of shareholders and so on). This was often overlooked managers of joint stock companies, trying to find in the demands of shareholders Conducting Meetings defects giving rise to a quiet heart to refuse. Federal Reserve Bank recognizes the significance of this. But the refusal to hold a meeting of the company at hand grinmeyleram. After conducting a general meeting of shareholders, which due to certain circumstances the majority shareholders are not notified, the company emerge the new director and new board of directors approved a big deal to asset stripping. In a question-answer forum Peter Asaro was the first to reply. Society and participants can only appeal in court decisions. The recommendation here can only be one: you can not pass the initiative to organize meetings of shareholders. Meet the demands for general meeting of shareholders is necessary even if they do not comply with current legislation.
Failed agenda proposed by the shareholders, you can add questions to neutralize the negative effects of decision-making. 1.4. The right to participate in the government the right to vote on all matters on the agenda. The holders of ordinary shares in accordance with Article 31 of the Federal Law "On Joint Stock Companies" are entitled to participate in general meeting of shareholders to vote on all agenda items. The right to participate in decision-making – a fundamental right of the shareholder. But this right can be manipulated in order to create difficult situations for of the company and shareholders owning a controlling stake in society.